Nothing files itself.
Four shipped workflows on one fact and claim foundation. Every one runs as a background job, pauses for attorney review at the stages that matter, and exports to Word on your firm’s own template. Opposition is in Early access.
Four workflows, one foundation.
Demand Letter
From intake documents to a visual argument outline to a finished pre-litigation demand letter.
- Review the facts, the claims and the mind map at any stage
- Validate selected causes of action with a prima facie check
- Edit the draft in the built-in editor; keep your edits as redlines
- Approve and print to a Word document that is saved to the matter
Unlocked by intake documents.
Complaint Drafter
Drafts the formal complaint from the same fact and claim foundation, so the work you did on the demand letter carries straight into the pleading.
- Warns you the draft may be stale if a fact or claim changes after drafting
- One tab per cause of action in the argument outline
- Firm profile shapes captions and statute references
Unlocked by a completed demand letter, or by intake without one.
Demurrer
Upload the complaint you were served. The system analyzes it, identifies which causes of action are vulnerable, maps the argument structure for each, and drafts the demurrer with grounds tied to each claim.
- Claim defects surfaced in the outline before a word is drafted
- Create Demurrer is gated on outline review
- Local Rules apply the court’s deadlines and formatting
Unlocked by the complaint document.
Complaint Checker
Runs your own complaint through scrutiny before the other side does.
- Pleading-defect review against the elements of each claim
- The same rejected-argument index the demurrer draws on
- Report you can act on before filing
Unlocked by the complaint document.
Opposition is replacement, not response.
Judges do not sign arguments. They sign orders.
A motion is a draft of the order the movant wants. An opposition has to hand the court a better one: the correct standard quoted, the burden restored, the record pin-cited, their authorities answered. Opposition starts from the matter you already have, so there is no upload step, and every citation in it comes from the verified record.
The working artifact is a board. One axis holds the fifteen or twenty assertions the motion cannot win without. The other holds the state of each: holds, contested, severed, conceded. The standard is fixed first, every citation is audited against the move claimed for it, and the brief is assembled in the order of your theory of denial, not the movant’s headings.
What a best-in-class opposition system must actually do →Built first for oppositions to a demurrer, a motion to dismiss and a Motion for Summary Judgment. In Early access with a first group of firms.
Six judgments that stay with the attorney
- The theory of denial
- The posture
- Each concession
- Whether each distinction holds
- Reliance on each authority
- The attestation
AI proposes, the lawyer disposes. Every legal judgment is logged as your act.
From the motion to the signed brief
- Choose the motion and the record
Pick the filing you are opposing and the documents that form your record. Mark each one citable or privileged. Privileged documents inform strategy and are never quoted or cited. Privilege is enforced, not advisory.
- Fix the standard first
The system proposes the motion type, the standard of review and the burden. You confirm them. Nothing downstream runs under an unconfirmed standard.
- Read the motion
What the movant wants, the story it is selling, and how strong each point is, on the law and on the facts. Adverse authority you cannot ignore is surfaced here, before the reply brief does it for you.
- Theory, posture, triage
You write the theory of why the motion should be denied and choose a full reframe, point by point, or a hybrid. Each point is opposed fully, answered briefly or conceded. A concession carries its scope, its reason and the argument it strengthens.
- Distinguish their authorities
For each case the motion leans on: what they cite it for, next to what the court actually held. Dicta, procedural posture and subsequent history are checked. A difference is not a distinction unless it changes how the rule applies.
- Accept, edit, reject
Every suggestion defaults to needs review. There is no accept-all. Filing-standard gates warn and never block; overriding one takes a typed reason, because a checkbox can be clicked unread and a sentence cannot.
- Certify and export
A pre-filing checklist and a signed attestation, then the memorandum of points and authorities with a log of every decision. It produces a filing and it produces a record.
The lawyer stays the decision-maker of record.
Review gates at the stages that matter
Facts, claims, outlines and drafts each have a review tile that stays open at every step, not just the current one.
Your edits survive as redlines
Finalize with “Keep edits as redline” and your manual changes are preserved as tracked changes, not silently absorbed.
Overwrite warnings
Re-running a stage that already produced facts, claims or an outline asks you first. Nothing is quietly regenerated.
Matter locking during runs
While a workflow is generating, the matter’s documents are locked against edits, so a draft is never built on shifting ground.
Arguments you can see
Outlines are visual mind maps of the argument, one tab per cause of action, so you review the structure before a word is drafted.
Every citation from the verified record
Drafts draw on Solon through Deep Research. No model in the citation path.
What the arc grows into.
Discovery Framework
Both sides of written discovery in three stages: the first sets drafted from the complaint, objections and answers grounded in the responsive documents, then gap analysis, the meet and confer letter and the Motion to Compel, with the responsive set from isResponsive() flowing straight in.
Discovery Framework →Answer to Complaint, Cross-Complaint
Completing the responsive pleading set, and turning defense into offense inside the same matter.
Firm Writing Style
Analyze a set of your own past documents and tune 23 style dimensions so every draft reads like your firm wrote it.
The MSJ Qualifier and the MSJ Engine are in Early access too, on their own pages. Status badges are the source of truth.
See a workflow on a matter you are actually carrying.
Onboarding is done with you: a live demurrer, demand letter or complaint built end to end with your team, on a shipped workflow, to a defensible memo.