The legal AI you can put your name on.
No model in our system is allowed to write a citation. Before you file, we check what the case stands for, whom it favors, and whether it survived.
Live in New York, California and Missouri. Illinois, Texas and Massachusetts next.
You cite a real case. The quote is perfect. And you still lose the motion.
A real, correctly quoted case still loses 5 ways. Nobody verifies 4 of them.
About 2,046 cases so far, growing daily, each one starting with a model-written citation a lawyer then signed. No model in our system is allowed to write one.
Wrong proposition
The case is real, but it does not stand for what you say it does.
Dicta as holding
You are leaning on language that was not the ruling.
Wrong direction
The authority actually favors the other side on the point that matters.
Narrowed rule
The holding was cut back after the case came down.
Rejected argument
The same court already refused this exact argument.
Document-level citator flags catch part of one of these. Read the five, one at a time →
The citation is never generated. It is retrieved, verified, and locked.
Every authority traces back to the exact lines it came from. At filing, the answer to “how did you come up with that?” is sealed, and its fingerprint goes on-chain. That is what you put your name on.
Checking the case is real is not checking that it still holds.
Substance verification is confirming that a legal proposition holds, whom it favors, and whether it survived, not merely that the citation exists.
Every tool on the market now says “verified.” What matters is what gets verified: the document, or the proposition inside it. A document-level flag can tell you a case drew negative treatment. It cannot tell you whether the line you cited is the line that drew it.
What substance verification means →- The citation resolves to an opinion
- The quote matches the text
- The case-level flag is green
Table stakes since 2023. Everyone ties here.
- The proposition is the holding, not dicta
- It favors your side on this point
- It governs in this forum, at this stage
- It survived: not narrowed, reversed, or rejected
Only one saves the motion. Legawrite.AI scores 88 percent Dispositive Recall at filing on an adversarial test, against 9 to 24 percent for the strongest alternatives on the same test.
No model in our system is allowed to write a citation.
Every citation is retrieved from Solon, never generated by a model. The residual risk is one-time extraction error, which we measure and publish.
Solon
Roughly 184 million source-linked legal propositions, distilled from 3.2 million published, precedential U.S. opinions and typed across 22 analytical dimensions. Read once, verified against the exact source lines, locked.
How Solon works →Verified against the source
Every proposition in a memo is checked against the lines it came from before it is used, and the source stays attached. A status problem stops a case before it can reach your draft.
Deep Research →Show Your Work
Every filed document carries a frozen derivation record: what was researched, which authorities were scored, which citations made the cut and why, every validation pass, every edit. Sealed, privileged, anchored on-chain at filing.
How the seal works →Find the motion before you draft it.
Most legal AI asks one big question: do I have a good summary judgment motion? MSJ Qualifier asks dozens of narrow ones. AI answers each against Solon and the record. Explicit decision rules then test whether any dispositive pathway survives the opponent’s best argument and the discovery still outstanding.
No win probability. No black-box score. UNKNOWN is never quietly turned into NO. Qualified pathways go straight to the MSJ Engine for drafting.
From intake documents to filed work product, with the reasoning shown at every step.
Deep Research
Filing-grade legal research on Solon. Propositions, not topics; good law checked case by case; your forum’s hierarchy; stage-aware retrieval; the cite that hurts you, on purpose.
Deep Research →Drafting workflows
Demand Letter, Complaint Drafter, Demurrer and Complaint Checker, on one fact and claim foundation that carries from intake to pleading. Nothing files itself.
The workflows →MotionLogic
A procedural decision engine, not a document generator. Describe the problem; it identifies the correct motion, ranks the alternatives, and flags filings that would waive rights or block appeal.
MotionLogic →Local Rules
Deadlines computed the way the court computes them. Formatting held to the courthouse’s own rules before you file, not flagged by the clerk after.
Local Rules →Show Your Work
Provenance as policy. The sealed derivation record answers the question law firm AI policies, judicial AI standing orders and malpractice insurers now ask: can you show how this document was made?
Show Your Work →Firm Memory
The firm-owned knowledge library. Reads the difference between what your lawyers drafted and what the firm filed, and hands the firm back its judgment, with receipts.
Firm Memory →Discovery Framework
Both sides of written discovery. The first sets drafted from the complaint, responses drafted from the record, then discovery gap analysis, the meet and confer letter and the Motion to Compel. isResponsive supplies the responsive set.
Discovery Framework →Opposition
Opposition is replacement, not response. The standard fixed first, the movant’s authorities distinguished one by one, every concession scoped, every judgment logged as yours.
Opposition →MSJ Qualifier and MSJ Engine
The Qualifier decides whether a dispositive pathway exists and whether the record is ready to use it. The Engine turns the qualified pathway into a complete, grounded motion.
MSJ Qualifier →Answer to Complaint, Cross-Complaint and Firm Writing Style are in Early access too. Status badges are the source of truth.
People like us file motions we can defend.
Defense litigators who sign
Boutique owners, panel counsel partners, public entity litigators, and the senior associates who draft what the partner signs. The demurrer, the motion to dismiss and the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed under your own name.
Firms that answer for every hour
Billing guidelines, capped rates, pre-approved budgets or flat fees: where efficiency is already forced, the margin stays with the firm, and the file is audited either way.
Insurers, risk pools and corporate legal departments
You audit outside counsel files and set the written rules on AI use. Verified authority, attorney review at every stage, per-firm isolation, an air-gapped option, and a sealed record of how each document was made.
Bring a motion you’re nervous about.
In the demo we walk it through the five ways a real, correctly quoted case quietly loses, on your own authorities.